Maxus e Deliver 3 against the DFSK EC35

This comparison doesn't include e-auto. It's the same 3CV table applied to the segment's two direct competitors: the Maxus e Deliver 3, the sales leader, and the DFSK EC35, the one with the most aggressive price.

Published: Source: 3CV, cutoff Jul 13, 2026

This page does not include e-auto. It's published because a comparison between two other brands, held to the same standard we use to talk about ourselves, is a reference — not a brochure.

Side-by-side spec sheet

Maxus e Deliver 3 (mejor versión) vs DFSK EC35
FieldMaxus e Deliver 3DFSK EC35
km/kWh4,34,1
Payload990 kg1.015 kg
Battery50,2 kWh38,7 kWh
HomologatedSep 7, 2021Dec 28, 2022

Where the Maxus e Deliver 3 wins

  • Certified efficiency: 4,3 km/kWh in its best version against 4,1 for the DFSK EC35.
  • Longer market presence: homologated in 2021, before the EC35 (2022).
  • Distribution ecosystem: Andes Motor / Grupo Kaufmann's nationwide network, with operating leases and bundled charging.

Where the DFSK EC35 wins

  • Homologated payload: 1.015 kg against 990 kg for the Maxus's best version.
  • More aggressive list price: the DFSK EC35 has been promoted from $17,990,000 + VAT [market observation, Jul 2026].

Both spec sheets come from the same registry e-auto uses to talk about its own EV48. See the full table of all 58 electric vans homologated in Chile.

e-auto · E-Auto SpA · Santiago, Chile · be-electric@e-auto.global